Search with a phone number:

941-379-1954 / 9413791954

Read comments about 941-379-1954

Did this number call you? Please leave your comment below.

Area code: 941
Prefix: 379
Country: United States
State: Florida
City: Sarasota
Company: Verizon Florida Inc.
Usage: Landline
Time zone: Eastern
Rating: 2.54
Views: 4237
Comments: 452
Please check information, users rating and reports about phone number 941-379-1954. This phone number is registered in Sarasota, Florida, United States and operated by Verizon Florida Inc.. Phone 9413791954 has a negative user rating. The number may be unsafe. All reports are written by real visitors of this website. This number has 452 user reports.
Phone number formats: +1 941-379-1954, 9413791954 , 941-379-1954, +19413791954, tel:+1-941-379-1954, 001941-379-1954
Call Activity 941-379-1954

Leave a comment about 9413791954:

Add Your Report

Comments for 941-379-1954

I wrote down Robert Cohen home # 914-763-0612. WONDER IF HE WOULD LIKE A CALL AROUND 3 OR 4 AM - NICE WAKE UP CALL! It would be worth the dime!!!!!!
0 0
Mark, HELL YES, count me in!!
0 0
They left a message on my answering machine saying they would call back. They did, they are part of the Neilson ratings and they Pay you $1.00 to do the survey. You do have to give them your name, age, and your mailing address of course. As long as they didnt ask for my social or DOB I'm ok with that. I have done this survey before. It takes about 10 minutes. Not a big deal to me. If you shut up and just answer yes or no the survey goes fast. Obviously I have nothing better to do so I didnt mind. Its people like me that contribute to Which is most popular Television stations, Music stations, and News Papers. The gentleman that gave me the survey was very polite.
0 0
Don't care whom they are..I don't know you so I block you ...[***]!
0 0
calls at all times, usually after 9:30pm. no message left usually, however, did leave one message that they would like me to complete survey. I am on the no call list so i don't know how they got my number.
0 0
They left a message on my answering machine saying they would call back. They did, they are part of the Neilson ratings and they Pay you $1.00 to do the survey. You do have to give them your name, age, and your mailing address of course. As long as they didnt ask for my social or DOB I'm ok with that. I have done this survey before. It takes about 10 minutes. Not a big deal to me. If you shut up and just answer yes or no the survey goes fast. Obviously I have nothing better to do so I didnt mind. Its people like me that contribute to Which is most popular Television stations, Music stations, and News Papers. The gentleman that gave me the survey was very polite. So if you answer the phone and take the survey they will leave you alone!
0 0
How many times do I have to block this on phone number? How do they get through if I have them on blocked? I start work as early as 4:45 in the morning. I do not want calls after 8pm. Each state has a tariff as to what time businesses may call a consumer. The next time they call I WILL answer the phone and tell them that if they call me again I am going to journal these calls and will be very happy to let my attorney know about these calls. If these people are legit, why don't they leave a message?
0 0
The Federal Trade Commission signaled on Monday that it would continue to crack down on debt collectors who harass consumers for money they may not even be legally obligated to pay. In the second-largest penalty ever levied on a debt collector, the F.T.C. said that Asset Acceptance, one of the nation’s largest debt collection companies, had agreed to pay a $2.5 million civil penalty to settle charges that the company deceived consumers when trying to collect old debts. The settlement is part of a broader effort to patrol the industry, agency officials said. The commission said it had pursued eight cases related to debt collection companies over the last two years. “Our attention to debt collection has increased over the past couple of years because the complaints have been on the rise,” said J. Reilly Dolan, assistant director for the F.T.C.’s division of financial practices. Consumer complaints about debt collection companies consistently rank as the second-highest category among all complaints at the agency, behind identity theft. But in 2010, complaints jumped 17 percent to 140,036, which represented 11 percent of all complaints in the commission’s database, up from 119,540, or about 9 percent of complaints, in 2009. Asset Acceptance, based in Warren, Mich., was charged with a variety of complaints, including failing to tell consumers that they could no longer be sued for failing to pay some debts because the debts were too old. The company’s collectors also failed to inform consumers that paying even a small portion of the amount owed would revive the debt — in other words, making a payment would extend the amount of time the collector could legally sue. Debt collectors have only a certain number of years to sue consumers. The statute of limitations varies by state, but typically ranges from two to 15 years, Mr. Dolan said, beginning when a consumer fails to make a payment. But borrowers often do not realize that making a payment on the old debt may restart the clock. Among other things, the complaint also contended that the company — which buys unpaid debts for pennies on the dollar from credit card companies, health clubs and telecommunications and utility providers and tries to collect them — reported inaccurate information about the consumers to the credit reporting agencies. It also said that Asset Acceptance failed to conduct a reasonable investigation when it was notified by one of the credit agencies that a debt was being disputed. Moreover, the complaint says that the company used illegal collection practices and that it continued to try to collect debts that consumers disputed even though the company failed to verify that the debt was valid. The proposed settlement with Asset Acceptance requires the company to tell consumers whose debt may be too old to be collected that it will not sue. It also requires the company to investigate disputed debts and to ensure it has a reasonable basis for its claims before going after the consumer. It is also barred from placing debt on credit reports without notifying the consumer. The penalty “is certainly a slap on the wrist and probably a little bit more, but it really depends on what the F.T.C. does to enforce this in the coming months and years,” said Robert Hobbs, deputy director at the National Consumer Law Center and author of “Fair Debt Collection” (National Consumer Law Center, 1987). But “it is a great step forward. It is not self-enforcing, and it has a mechanism for the F.T.C. to follow up.” Still, while the settlement requires the company to take more responsibility for checking the statute of limitations before it contacts consumers, he said most states did not require debt collectors to do that. That means it is up to consumers to know the rules on the statute of limitations, which, he said, can be “an enormously complex legal question.” In a statement, Asset Acceptance said that the settlement ended an F.T.C. investigation that began nearly six years ago, and that the company did not admit to any of the allegations. “We are pleased to have this matter behind us, and to have clarity on the F.T.C.’s policies and expectations of the debt collection industry,” said Rion Needs, president and chief executive of Asset Acceptance. In March, another leading debt collection company, West Asset Management, agreed to pay $2.8 million, the largest civil penalty ever levied by the F.T.C., to settle charges that its collection techniques violated the law. The commission charged that West Asset’s collectors often called consumers multiple times a day, sometimes using rude and abusive language, about accounts that were not theirs. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the F.T.C. now share enforcement authority for debt collection companies, though the new bureau has a power that the F.T.C. did not: it can write new rules for debt collectors. But F.T.C. officials said that debt collection enforcement would remain a top priority.
0 0
04/11/2010, 33573Scarbzrough Res (callerid ID trick to make you thinkit is a RES or residence)weekends around 4 or 5 pm calls.Are they scammers?I and others DO NOT pick up their call
0 0
Every night now for 3. Always after 7:00 p.m. Leave no message. Sick of it. Finally blocked their 941-379-1954. They still call even when its blocked. Sick of call blocking not working either. Why do we pay for services that don't do what they are supposed to do????
0 0

Recently comments

866-432-0683 Scam suspicion 1
Scam call, unsafe to answer.
575-616-3033 Scam suspicion 5
Husband got a call from this number. Didn’t answer.
250-448-9459 Scam suspicion 5
DO NOT ANSWER
250-277-1241 Debt collector 1
collection agency
469-249-0700 Scam suspicion 4
Call came from Mike Manning @ 469-249-0700, did not answer. Upon look up it said it belonged to Fortitude Svcs. In Virginia. However the area code doesn't correlate.
888-407-0407 Scam suspicion 2
Phishing scam...
404-978-8978 Scam suspicion 13
They keep saying they are from Google Ads, yet they can't ever fix the problem I'm having, but they always want more info. I give them nothing.
314-989-6789 Scam suspicion 3
United Healthcare fake requesting birthdate and address verification and premium payment info
877-836-1518 Scam suspicion 7
This is a spam call reporting suspicious activity.
This place ran a Hard Credit Inquiry on me. I have never contacted them and have not asked for any loans
844-223-5661 Scam suspicion 22
scammed for tickets fake site, has many bad reviews
866-316-3360 Debt collector 20
wow bad communication on part of ig companys.
Got sent my sis account access code. Not me
8005284800
Juðith a matthews
8663669649
8663669649
86636609549
210-749-2901 Unknow 6
People call for a person wherabouts I dont know the person Ray Garza i said that he was previous tenant ,,annoying af.
scary mental hospital playing creepy music in the background random lady is talking