Search with a phone number:

941-379-1954 / 9413791954

Read comments about 941-379-1954

Did this number call you? Please leave your comment below.

Area code: 941
Prefix: 379
Country: United States
State: Florida
City: Sarasota
Company: Verizon Florida Inc.
Usage: Landline
Time zone: Eastern
Rating: 2.54
Views: 4634
Comments: 452
Please check information, users rating and reports about phone number 941-379-1954. This phone number is registered in Sarasota, Florida, United States and operated by Verizon Florida Inc.. Phone 9413791954 has a negative user rating. The number may be unsafe. All reports are written by real visitors of this website. This number has 452 user reports.
Phone number formats: +1 941-379-1954, 9413791954 , 941-379-1954, +19413791954, tel:+1-941-379-1954, 001941-379-1954
Call Activity 941-379-1954

Leave a comment about 9413791954:

Add Your Report

Comments for 941-379-1954

I wrote down Robert Cohen home # 914-763-0612. WONDER IF HE WOULD LIKE A CALL AROUND 3 OR 4 AM - NICE WAKE UP CALL! It would be worth the dime!!!!!!
0 0
Mark, HELL YES, count me in!!
0 0
They left a message on my answering machine saying they would call back. They did, they are part of the Neilson ratings and they Pay you $1.00 to do the survey. You do have to give them your name, age, and your mailing address of course. As long as they didnt ask for my social or DOB I'm ok with that. I have done this survey before. It takes about 10 minutes. Not a big deal to me. If you shut up and just answer yes or no the survey goes fast. Obviously I have nothing better to do so I didnt mind. Its people like me that contribute to Which is most popular Television stations, Music stations, and News Papers. The gentleman that gave me the survey was very polite.
0 0
Don't care whom they are..I don't know you so I block you ...[***]!
0 0
calls at all times, usually after 9:30pm. no message left usually, however, did leave one message that they would like me to complete survey. I am on the no call list so i don't know how they got my number.
0 0
They left a message on my answering machine saying they would call back. They did, they are part of the Neilson ratings and they Pay you $1.00 to do the survey. You do have to give them your name, age, and your mailing address of course. As long as they didnt ask for my social or DOB I'm ok with that. I have done this survey before. It takes about 10 minutes. Not a big deal to me. If you shut up and just answer yes or no the survey goes fast. Obviously I have nothing better to do so I didnt mind. Its people like me that contribute to Which is most popular Television stations, Music stations, and News Papers. The gentleman that gave me the survey was very polite. So if you answer the phone and take the survey they will leave you alone!
0 0
How many times do I have to block this on phone number? How do they get through if I have them on blocked? I start work as early as 4:45 in the morning. I do not want calls after 8pm. Each state has a tariff as to what time businesses may call a consumer. The next time they call I WILL answer the phone and tell them that if they call me again I am going to journal these calls and will be very happy to let my attorney know about these calls. If these people are legit, why don't they leave a message?
0 0
The Federal Trade Commission signaled on Monday that it would continue to crack down on debt collectors who harass consumers for money they may not even be legally obligated to pay. In the second-largest penalty ever levied on a debt collector, the F.T.C. said that Asset Acceptance, one of the nation’s largest debt collection companies, had agreed to pay a $2.5 million civil penalty to settle charges that the company deceived consumers when trying to collect old debts. The settlement is part of a broader effort to patrol the industry, agency officials said. The commission said it had pursued eight cases related to debt collection companies over the last two years. “Our attention to debt collection has increased over the past couple of years because the complaints have been on the rise,” said J. Reilly Dolan, assistant director for the F.T.C.’s division of financial practices. Consumer complaints about debt collection companies consistently rank as the second-highest category among all complaints at the agency, behind identity theft. But in 2010, complaints jumped 17 percent to 140,036, which represented 11 percent of all complaints in the commission’s database, up from 119,540, or about 9 percent of complaints, in 2009. Asset Acceptance, based in Warren, Mich., was charged with a variety of complaints, including failing to tell consumers that they could no longer be sued for failing to pay some debts because the debts were too old. The company’s collectors also failed to inform consumers that paying even a small portion of the amount owed would revive the debt — in other words, making a payment would extend the amount of time the collector could legally sue. Debt collectors have only a certain number of years to sue consumers. The statute of limitations varies by state, but typically ranges from two to 15 years, Mr. Dolan said, beginning when a consumer fails to make a payment. But borrowers often do not realize that making a payment on the old debt may restart the clock. Among other things, the complaint also contended that the company — which buys unpaid debts for pennies on the dollar from credit card companies, health clubs and telecommunications and utility providers and tries to collect them — reported inaccurate information about the consumers to the credit reporting agencies. It also said that Asset Acceptance failed to conduct a reasonable investigation when it was notified by one of the credit agencies that a debt was being disputed. Moreover, the complaint says that the company used illegal collection practices and that it continued to try to collect debts that consumers disputed even though the company failed to verify that the debt was valid. The proposed settlement with Asset Acceptance requires the company to tell consumers whose debt may be too old to be collected that it will not sue. It also requires the company to investigate disputed debts and to ensure it has a reasonable basis for its claims before going after the consumer. It is also barred from placing debt on credit reports without notifying the consumer. The penalty “is certainly a slap on the wrist and probably a little bit more, but it really depends on what the F.T.C. does to enforce this in the coming months and years,” said Robert Hobbs, deputy director at the National Consumer Law Center and author of “Fair Debt Collection” (National Consumer Law Center, 1987). But “it is a great step forward. It is not self-enforcing, and it has a mechanism for the F.T.C. to follow up.” Still, while the settlement requires the company to take more responsibility for checking the statute of limitations before it contacts consumers, he said most states did not require debt collectors to do that. That means it is up to consumers to know the rules on the statute of limitations, which, he said, can be “an enormously complex legal question.” In a statement, Asset Acceptance said that the settlement ended an F.T.C. investigation that began nearly six years ago, and that the company did not admit to any of the allegations. “We are pleased to have this matter behind us, and to have clarity on the F.T.C.’s policies and expectations of the debt collection industry,” said Rion Needs, president and chief executive of Asset Acceptance. In March, another leading debt collection company, West Asset Management, agreed to pay $2.8 million, the largest civil penalty ever levied by the F.T.C., to settle charges that its collection techniques violated the law. The commission charged that West Asset’s collectors often called consumers multiple times a day, sometimes using rude and abusive language, about accounts that were not theirs. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the F.T.C. now share enforcement authority for debt collection companies, though the new bureau has a power that the F.T.C. did not: it can write new rules for debt collectors. But F.T.C. officials said that debt collection enforcement would remain a top priority.
0 0
04/11/2010, 33573Scarbzrough Res (callerid ID trick to make you thinkit is a RES or residence)weekends around 4 or 5 pm calls.Are they scammers?I and others DO NOT pick up their call
0 0
Every night now for 3. Always after 7:00 p.m. Leave no message. Sick of it. Finally blocked their 941-379-1954. They still call even when its blocked. Sick of call blocking not working either. Why do we pay for services that don't do what they are supposed to do????
0 0

Recently comments

586-217-2581 Scam suspicion 10
spam text: "no rush. Whenever you decide you're in the mood. I am glad to support, as for our previous messages"
862-683-5488 Scam suspicion 1
NOTHING TO IDENTIFY WHO OR WHAT THIS TEXT IS ABOUT! PHISHING ATTEMPT TEXT MESSAGE FROM THIS NUMBER: (862) 683-5488 CONTENT OF TEXT: "Compliance Notice, MY NAME: Your Service Access Is Under Review - Possible policy issues have been ... read more
Vincent eugene martz mercersburg Pennsylvania is a big scum de da lowlife piece of tard human waste McConnellsburg Topix/Craigslist replacement » Re: Vincent martz mcconnellsburg pa the egor, igor Vincent martz 5692 little cove rd, mercersburg pa ... read more
717-485-3131 Unknow 9
Vincent eugene martz egor, igor, igor nutcase and your wife you both have computer balls and pussies and you both are psyco but in person you lie scam, steal, murder, call names, harass others, assult family like your dad you stole money off him and ... read more
bill collector
888-436-8828 Scam suspicion 26
He said he was calling from Bank of America about a fraud attempt and to call this number back. It wasn't BOA.
206-538-9935 Unknow 1
Sent text (206) 538-9935 May I ask you something?
Vincent eugene martz egor, igor, igor nutcase and your wife you both have computer balls and pussies and you both are psyco but in person you lie scam, steal, murder, call names, harass others, assult family like your dad you stole money off him and ... read more
717-328-4503 Scam suspicion 81
Vincent eugene martz egor, igor, igor nutcase and your wife you both have computer balls and pussies and you both are psyco but in person you lie scam, steal, murder, call names, harass others, assult family like your dad you stole money off him and ... read more
717-328-4503 Survey 81
Vincent eugene martz egor, igor, igor nutcase and your wife you both have computer balls and pussies and you both are psyco but in person you lie scam, steal, murder, call names, harass others, assult family like your dad you stole money off him and ... read more
760-935-3409 Scam suspicion 2
Got a text about wanting to buy a home I lived in as a renter a long time ago.
437-266-1474 Scam suspicion 1
Never anyone on call or in message. Just click. Fills my mailbox constantly!
281-517-6333 Unknow 10
called three times in less than 2 minutes! Came up as "Spam" sure enough.. pretty sure it is. No reason to keep calling and calling and calling.. Finally, blocked it. Never answered the phone, and.. glad I didn't.
608-324-3024 Scam suspicion 5
Scam. Sent letter saying I placed $3000 order. Never happened. Haven't even heard of this place before.
Got a call from this number this morning, but didn't answer as I have no idea who it is.
215-588-1364 Unknow 2
There’s no human interaction anymore. Received a text asking for my email. In todays society you have to wonder if it’s legit , and if it is , it’s a lousy way of doing business
Vincent Martz, who has been involved in some controversies, is actually not biologically related to the Martz family in McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania. He was adopted by Harold and Linda Martz, which led to some family tensions.Vincent Eugene Martz, a ... read more
Vincent Martz, who has been involved in some controversies, is actually not biologically related to the Martz family in McConnellsburg, Pennsylvania. He was adopted by Harold and Linda Martz, which led to some family tensions.Vincent Eugene Martz, a ... read more
619-370-7469
619-370-7469 Scam suspicion 3
619-370-7469 619-370-7469