Search with a phone number:

941-379-1954 / 9413791954

Read comments about 941-379-1954

Did this number call you? Please leave your comment below.

Area code: 941
Prefix: 379
Country: United States
State: Florida
City: Sarasota
Company: Verizon Florida Inc.
Usage: Landline
Time zone: Eastern
Rating: 2.54
Views: 7046
Comments: 452
Please check information, users rating and reports about phone number 941-379-1954. This phone number is registered in Sarasota, Florida, United States and operated by Verizon Florida Inc.. Phone 9413791954 has a negative user rating. The number may be unsafe. All reports are written by real visitors of this website. This number has 452 user reports.
Phone number formats: +1 941-379-1954, 9413791954 , 941-379-1954, +19413791954, tel:+1-941-379-1954, 001941-379-1954
Call Activity 941-379-1954

Leave a comment about 9413791954:

Add Your Report

Comments for 941-379-1954

I wrote down Robert Cohen home # 914-763-0612. WONDER IF HE WOULD LIKE A CALL AROUND 3 OR 4 AM - NICE WAKE UP CALL! It would be worth the dime!!!!!!
0 0
Mark, HELL YES, count me in!!
0 0
They left a message on my answering machine saying they would call back. They did, they are part of the Neilson ratings and they Pay you $1.00 to do the survey. You do have to give them your name, age, and your mailing address of course. As long as they didnt ask for my social or DOB I'm ok with that. I have done this survey before. It takes about 10 minutes. Not a big deal to me. If you shut up and just answer yes or no the survey goes fast. Obviously I have nothing better to do so I didnt mind. Its people like me that contribute to Which is most popular Television stations, Music stations, and News Papers. The gentleman that gave me the survey was very polite.
0 0
Don't care whom they are..I don't know you so I block you ...[***]!
0 0
calls at all times, usually after 9:30pm. no message left usually, however, did leave one message that they would like me to complete survey. I am on the no call list so i don't know how they got my number.
0 0
They left a message on my answering machine saying they would call back. They did, they are part of the Neilson ratings and they Pay you $1.00 to do the survey. You do have to give them your name, age, and your mailing address of course. As long as they didnt ask for my social or DOB I'm ok with that. I have done this survey before. It takes about 10 minutes. Not a big deal to me. If you shut up and just answer yes or no the survey goes fast. Obviously I have nothing better to do so I didnt mind. Its people like me that contribute to Which is most popular Television stations, Music stations, and News Papers. The gentleman that gave me the survey was very polite. So if you answer the phone and take the survey they will leave you alone!
0 0
How many times do I have to block this on phone number? How do they get through if I have them on blocked? I start work as early as 4:45 in the morning. I do not want calls after 8pm. Each state has a tariff as to what time businesses may call a consumer. The next time they call I WILL answer the phone and tell them that if they call me again I am going to journal these calls and will be very happy to let my attorney know about these calls. If these people are legit, why don't they leave a message?
0 0
The Federal Trade Commission signaled on Monday that it would continue to crack down on debt collectors who harass consumers for money they may not even be legally obligated to pay. In the second-largest penalty ever levied on a debt collector, the F.T.C. said that Asset Acceptance, one of the nation’s largest debt collection companies, had agreed to pay a $2.5 million civil penalty to settle charges that the company deceived consumers when trying to collect old debts. The settlement is part of a broader effort to patrol the industry, agency officials said. The commission said it had pursued eight cases related to debt collection companies over the last two years. “Our attention to debt collection has increased over the past couple of years because the complaints have been on the rise,” said J. Reilly Dolan, assistant director for the F.T.C.’s division of financial practices. Consumer complaints about debt collection companies consistently rank as the second-highest category among all complaints at the agency, behind identity theft. But in 2010, complaints jumped 17 percent to 140,036, which represented 11 percent of all complaints in the commission’s database, up from 119,540, or about 9 percent of complaints, in 2009. Asset Acceptance, based in Warren, Mich., was charged with a variety of complaints, including failing to tell consumers that they could no longer be sued for failing to pay some debts because the debts were too old. The company’s collectors also failed to inform consumers that paying even a small portion of the amount owed would revive the debt — in other words, making a payment would extend the amount of time the collector could legally sue. Debt collectors have only a certain number of years to sue consumers. The statute of limitations varies by state, but typically ranges from two to 15 years, Mr. Dolan said, beginning when a consumer fails to make a payment. But borrowers often do not realize that making a payment on the old debt may restart the clock. Among other things, the complaint also contended that the company — which buys unpaid debts for pennies on the dollar from credit card companies, health clubs and telecommunications and utility providers and tries to collect them — reported inaccurate information about the consumers to the credit reporting agencies. It also said that Asset Acceptance failed to conduct a reasonable investigation when it was notified by one of the credit agencies that a debt was being disputed. Moreover, the complaint says that the company used illegal collection practices and that it continued to try to collect debts that consumers disputed even though the company failed to verify that the debt was valid. The proposed settlement with Asset Acceptance requires the company to tell consumers whose debt may be too old to be collected that it will not sue. It also requires the company to investigate disputed debts and to ensure it has a reasonable basis for its claims before going after the consumer. It is also barred from placing debt on credit reports without notifying the consumer. The penalty “is certainly a slap on the wrist and probably a little bit more, but it really depends on what the F.T.C. does to enforce this in the coming months and years,” said Robert Hobbs, deputy director at the National Consumer Law Center and author of “Fair Debt Collection” (National Consumer Law Center, 1987). But “it is a great step forward. It is not self-enforcing, and it has a mechanism for the F.T.C. to follow up.” Still, while the settlement requires the company to take more responsibility for checking the statute of limitations before it contacts consumers, he said most states did not require debt collectors to do that. That means it is up to consumers to know the rules on the statute of limitations, which, he said, can be “an enormously complex legal question.” In a statement, Asset Acceptance said that the settlement ended an F.T.C. investigation that began nearly six years ago, and that the company did not admit to any of the allegations. “We are pleased to have this matter behind us, and to have clarity on the F.T.C.’s policies and expectations of the debt collection industry,” said Rion Needs, president and chief executive of Asset Acceptance. In March, another leading debt collection company, West Asset Management, agreed to pay $2.8 million, the largest civil penalty ever levied by the F.T.C., to settle charges that its collection techniques violated the law. The commission charged that West Asset’s collectors often called consumers multiple times a day, sometimes using rude and abusive language, about accounts that were not theirs. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the F.T.C. now share enforcement authority for debt collection companies, though the new bureau has a power that the F.T.C. did not: it can write new rules for debt collectors. But F.T.C. officials said that debt collection enforcement would remain a top priority.
0 0
04/11/2010, 33573Scarbzrough Res (callerid ID trick to make you thinkit is a RES or residence)weekends around 4 or 5 pm calls.Are they scammers?I and others DO NOT pick up their call
0 0
Every night now for 3. Always after 7:00 p.m. Leave no message. Sick of it. Finally blocked their 941-379-1954. They still call even when its blocked. Sick of call blocking not working either. Why do we pay for services that don't do what they are supposed to do????
0 0

Recently comments

Vincent martz mcconnellsburg pa the egor, igor igor convicted rapist of julie martz and kids Vincent martz 5692 little cove rd, mercersburg pa 17236 Someone who knows the family Ao Vincent why do u put stuff on here about your family grow up stop ... read more
: Vincent martz mcconnellsburg pa the egor, igor igor convicted rapist of julie martz and kids Vincent martz 5692 little cove rd, mercersburg pa 17236 Someone who knows the family Ao Vincent why do u put stuff on here about your family grow up stop ... read more
Julie Martz Just SHUT YOUR FREAKIN MOUTH, you make no sense at all. you are so brain dead it's pathetic you are such an embarrassment to McConnellsburg. you are really making yourself look bad. And you want to talk about acting like a fool, well ... read more
Who do you report this scammer to????
808-220-3763 Debt collector 4
Credit One Bank overseas call center
252-375-3449 Scam suspicion 72
Scam texting me hundreds of times: "Hey Jeff, Samantha here with TLR. We buy land and I came across your parcel in Sampson. Would you be open to a quick chat?"
902-334-1890 Scam suspicion 11
called and left no message
I have had calls from this number the last 5 days that I have not responded to as it is an unknown number for me.
Julie Martz is a total compulsive liar. she loves to screw truck drivers and have their babies. she is a total nut case and she is brainless. She is a bad witness in McConnellsburg pa all she does is lie all the time She need mental help. she needs ... read more
269-932-4082 Scam suspicion 4
Said it was collect call from inmate
978-547-2104 Scam suspicion 6
My Guardio app reported this number as SPAM. I am blocking this number
888-373-1969 Scam suspicion 2
I called the Chase number on the back of my card and they said they had NOT called me, said it was scammers. I had two calls on my machine asking me to call them back.
spoofing call, don't answer
No one cares what you say Julie Martz, we all know who much you lie. So SHUT UP.
Thought I called spectrum. This person answered had my info already so I assumed it was spectrum. But it was weird and I asked who are you. Couldn’t understand the company name. Said they deal with all sorts of internet providers including ... read more
Re: Vincent martz mcconnellsburg pa the egor, igor Vincent martz 5692 little cove rd, mercersburg pa 17236 Someone who knows the family Ao Vincent why do u put stuff on here about your family grow up stop acting like a fool you was there when you ... read more
801-619-2558 Scam suspicion 13
Claim to be discover card. I don't have that disreputable card and haven't had one for 20 years, so they have no reason to call me. Very suspicious.
978-547-2104 Scam suspicion 6
Wellcare never calls you, they send out notices. This is second call I’ve got from two separate phone numbers stating they are Wellcare. Scam
866-683-6099 Unknow 8
'fleet card svcs' left message with no content
800-830-0363 Scam suspicion 9
I miss dialed and got this number, they totally misrepresented themselves and said they were the company I was calling. Asking for my name, DOB and address. Once I figured out, they weren't who they said they were, I asked for a manager they told ... read more