Search with a phone number:

540-898-8818 / 5408988818

Read comments about 540-898-8818

Did this number call you? Please leave your comment below.

Area code: 540
Prefix: 898
Country: United States
State: Virginia
City: Fredericksbg
Company: Verizon Virginia
Usage: Landline
Time zone: Eastern
Rating: 2.46
Views: 3811
Comments: 493
Please check information, users rating and reports about phone number 540-898-8818. This phone number is registered in Fredericksbg, Virginia, United States and operated by Verizon Virginia. Phone 5408988818 has a negative user rating. The number may be unsafe. All reports are written by real visitors of this website. This number has 493 user reports.
Phone number formats: +1 540-898-8818, 5408988818 , 540-898-8818, +15408988818, tel:+1-540-898-8818, 001540-898-8818
Call Activity 540-898-8818

Leave a comment about 5408988818:

Add Your Report

Comments for 540-898-8818

Got a call from this number 540-898-8818) on my business line. When I answered with my company name, he asked if he had reached a business. I said yes and he apologized and hung up without identifying himself or his company. Clearly they are looking to hassle people at home trying to relax after a hard days work and since it was 6PM when he called, they like to hassle you during dinner. They claim to do social surveys (probably for a political party or the NRA, etc). You unfortunately can't BLOCK calls like these unless the company itself is willing to take your info off their list because the Gov't says surveys are allowed to bother you like this.
0 0
Phone bills are not paid so households can be harassed for all things possible at anytime of the day or night. This is one of the main reasons people do not want landlines anymore. I especially don't need, when told of the time and not to call back, for the black-[***] caller to start chuckling because its just so god damned funny that people are getting tired of it. Princeton Data, or whoever this line is registered to needs to have their building burnt down. Wouldn't that be funny too?
0 0
"WE"? Speak for yourself.
0 0
Keep receiving calls from this number saying they're doing a survey on cell phone users. Anyone else getting these calls? How did you get rid of them?
0 0
I should not be on their list or anyone's surveys and I couldn't talk to a person
0 0
How nice. And your point is...? ...that you are somehow 'superior' and 'nice' because you are not fed up with these calls or even door-to-door solicitors? (Most of the door-to-door solicitors we get are religious proselytizers like you - or con artists selling unlicensed 'home improvements.') Would you also require yourself - and everyone else, of whom you are obviously "The Boss" - to be 'polite' and 'civil' to a thief, rapist, or murderer who broke into your home? Where is your line? Are you happily handing out your personal info and credit card numbers to all the 'nice people' who only want to give you a 'free cruise' or '$1000 Walmart Gift Card' or a 'free Home Security System' or 'lowered interest rates?'I have a 'right' to be angry, with good reasons for it. Why must I tolerate being BULLIED in my own home with 'rules' as to how I must 'take' it from a well-intentioned, but poorly executed law? HOW is that a 'pea-brained' point??? Is YOUR only way to make any 'points' is to NAME CALL to INTIMIDATE? YOU, then, are NO BETTER than the telemarketers, ESPECIALLY the CRIMINAL ONES that use name calling and profanity. Is that what "Good Christians" - or whatever religion you claim to follow - do?I engage in PLENTY of civil discourse and, in fact, am a well-known activist for social and environmental issues in my area. I just don't like having it FORCED upon me, in the PRIVATE setting of MY OWN HOME, on MY OWN PRIVATE, self-FUNDED PHONE & line, as I've said before. PRIVATE is PRIVATE; PUBLIC is PUBLIC. One can have BOTH in one's life, simultaneously and separately! WHAT is so 'ignorant' or difficult to understand about that??? If these intrusions are not something that bothers you, then why don't you PUBLISH **your phone number** HERE so that everyone who wants to "engage" in "healthy conversations" about it with someone as *astute* and *informed* on the issue as you are, can.I'll stick to my point. The GOVERNMENT *CAN NOT* and *WILL NOT* determine FOR me WHO can call, WHEN they can call or WHY they can call. Only a Communist would think otherwise.
0 0
Called my cell phone and said he was from Princeton Research doing a survey about cell phone usage. He called at 11:50pm my time on a Friday night. Gave him an indignant earful and hung up.
0 0
Called one night and told them I did not want to take there survey. Called back in a few days after family members had gone to bed. Didn't get to phone on time. Called back 3 nights later. Told them I was on the Do Not Call Registry but operator claimed they weren't selling anything so were not included. Refused to tell me how long the survey would take. Told them they had 3 minutes of my time. Operator said she could not guarantee that. Reiterated my request not to be called again and ended call.
0 0
NINTH CALL from this number since 6/11/14; SIXTH CALL in THREE WEEKS and THIRD CALL within the last THREE DAYS. We HAVE "TOLD THEM NOT TO CALL" *AND* BLOCKED their number, but THEY *REFUSE* to STOP **AND** on 9/17/14 they called at **9:03PM** - A VIOLATION of the DNC LAW. Even though they are now BLOCKED - and we will NEVER ANSWER their calls or 'surveys', we are STILL DISTURBED by the ONE RING of our blocking system before it disconnects. WHY does the COMPUTER/ROBODIALER not register that it is being DISCONNECTED after one ring, which is an indication of being blocked and THEREFORE interpret it as 'DO NOT CALL?' The other calls have been: 6/11/14 7:55PM (REJECTED, BLOCKED); 6/20/14 6:21PM; 8/9/14 7:08PM; 8/29/14 7:15PM; SA. 9/13/14 11:11AM; 9/17/14 **9:03PM** (VIOLATION!); SA. 9/20/14 11:09AM; *SU.* 9/21/14 7:31PM; M 9/22/14 6:57PM.
0 0
Received this call to do a survey for a Non-Profit group. They offered me $5 to complete the survey. I've worked as a telemarketer and tell me say, its the worst job you can have. The pay isn't the best, nobody "likes" telemarketers and my experience is that the supervisors/bosses are f*cking nuts. So know all of this, I took the survey. It took about 10 minutes and were simple yes/no questions. At the end he asked where to send the $5 check and I declined to receive the payment. People, I get it if you're busy but if you aren't busy, Why not do the simple survey??? We all read articles that contain statistics. Where do you think that information comes from?
0 0

Recently comments

520-413-6211 Debt collector 4
rogue debt collector
Yea, I got this phone call today. And sounds like a scam call. The speaker spoke mandarin. it is not professional. I doubted it and hanged up the phone.
The rape of Julie Martz is a total lie. He never touched her, he had No desire for her. She was after him and she destroyed the family with lies. Don't believe anything she says. She has created a total Monster out of herself. He never even wanted ... read more
A woman named Julie Martz is repeatedly mentioned in connection with Vincent. Multiple commenters claim she has been posting inflammatory content about him for decades, allegedly driven by personal resentment of wanting Vincent Martz as her lover ... read more
555-555-5555 Prank 477
5555555
302-255-8000 Scam suspicion 68
If they call you from this number, it is a fraud attempt. This is a legitimate Barclay's number, so it seems authentic, but the scammer uses spoofing to pretend they are Barclay's. They are actually trying ot get your credit card info by saying ... read more
Martz family’s animosity toward Vincent Eugene Martz appears to stem from a long and painful history of alleged abuse, betrayal, and criminal behavior. Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons behind the deep rift: 🧬 Family Tensions and Adoption ... read more
888-397-3742 Scam suspicion 25
9/15/2025 - caller identified himself as Luke Hendricks, but had a heavy Indian accent, and gave an Experian Employee #. He had my date of birth and last four digits of my social security #. Said someone in Michigan was using my information. Was ... read more
604-599-0502 Scam suspicion 2
Surrey Police Service (SPS) is warning the public that our non-emergency number, (604) 599-0502, is currently being spoofed by fraudsters to contact people with the objective of obtaining their personal information. Incoming calls appear to be from ... read more
604-697-4500 Scam suspicion 2
Donna MC from Kelowna, BC - Snapchat along with numerous other social media apps she is on, tinder sl:: , soliciting a scandalous cheating lifestyle Be cautious, tied to other android apk apps offering her services.
Cool man!
Martz family’s animosity toward Vincent Eugene Martz appears to stem from a long and painful history of alleged abuse, betrayal, and criminal behavior. Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons behind the deep rift: 🧬 Family Tensions and Adoption ... read more
Martz family’s animosity toward Vincent Eugene Martz appears to stem from a long and painful history of alleged abuse, betrayal, and criminal behavior. Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons behind the deep rift: 🧬 Family Tensions and Adoption ... read more
Martz family’s animosity toward Vincent Eugene Martz appears to stem from a long and painful history of alleged abuse, betrayal, and criminal behavior. Here’s a breakdown of the key reasons behind the deep rift: 🧬 Family Tensions and Adoption ... read more
and “lower than dirt.” These comments suggest a strong dislike from some members of the community3. Nickname :igor\“E-gor”: He’s referred to by this nickname in some local posts, which implies social alienation and a lack of acceptance ... read more
520-413-6211 Debt collector 4
National Commercial Collections Agency — Mesa, AZ
604-584-2771 Scam suspicion 12
Has called an unacceptable amount of times within the past couple of days and has managed to get their call through despite the number being blocked and reported as junk more than once.
Scam caller.
The caller left a long message that my Federal income taxes were due NOW!
579-477-9880 Scam suspicion 1
Said there name is Amanda and that she new me. Called me by my internet nickname name so I knew it wasn’t someone I knew.