Read comments about 208-327-1751
Did this number call you? Please leave your comment below.
| Area code: | 208 |
| Prefix: | 327 |
| Country: | United States |
| State: | Idaho |
| City: | Boise |
| Company: | Qwest Corporation |
| Usage: | Landline |
| Time zone: | Mountain / Pacific |
Leave a comment about 2083271751:
I also like so many others have been receiving calls on my caller ID and voice mill with no messages. And when I call the number I can't get a live person on the other end So if no one is on the other end to sell me anything, what are all these long distance phone calls for?
The number 208-327-1751 with the name Klein Sturner keeps showing up on my caller ID. They never leave a message nor do they say anything when answered. If they can't leave a message or talk when answered, what's the purpose. Obviously someone doesn't have a life. Well, I do and I would appreciate them not calling for say something when they do!
I recieved a telephone call from this number from a woman asking to speak to my husban, Sid. The caller claimed to be calling about his subscription to COF magazine. I reminded the caller that our number was on the DO NOT CALL LIST. I have yet to reprot the call to the list.Called ID through *69 identified the call as coming from 208-327-1751. I also activated a trace on the call.
Yeah, these a-holes called me and hung up when I said "Hello." I think the Sturner and Klein employee pretty much gave the scoop on these idiots and how they avoid Do Not Call lists. I still don't get the business model. If they simply hang-up whenever someone answers, how do they make any money?
I just got a phone call around 6:30 EST and when I googled the name Sturner Klein - this is where I ended up. Thanks to this site I checked my do no call status (I am on the list) and reported the call.
Re: 208-327-1751I am uncertain as to whether I reported the call from 208 or 218. I double checked with the Verizon *69 caller-ID service and found that the number was in fact 208-327-1751.The Stein Marketing research company should be fined regardles of who was calling! The waomn caller identified COM magazine as the maganzine she was repsresenting. Stein also, according to the info give, shills for National Geographic, a subscription to which my husband has not renewed.The caller never mentioned National Geographic.Nevertheless, WE NEVER SUBSCRIBE to ANY magazines via a third party service. I think that all third party service tlemareting calls should be illegal, also. If someone has not renewed a subscription to a magazine, and has not taken that magazine for a couple of years, then thetelemarketer, with whom the party never had a business relationship or used as a subscription serivce, theoretically should have no right to use the caller infromation to try to get the past subscriber to renew a sunscription! What is even worse, the caller did not identify the actual magazine on the list to which the individual to whom she wished to speak had subscribed-- so THE ENTIRE CALL WAS BOGUS TELEMARKETING.STEIN SHOULD BE LEVIED A HEAVY FINE~