Read comments about 309-663-6700
Did this number call you? Please leave your comment below.
Area code: | 309 |
Prefix: | 663 |
Country: | United States |
State: | Illinois |
City: | Bloomington |
Company: | Frontier North |
Usage: | Landline |
Time zone: | Central |
Leave a comment about 3096636700:
Some guy calling asking for a friend claiming he is a attorney. When I ask him to state his business he claims he can't tell me, but he sure as hell can call my phone daily asking for my friend and questions.
Yes, got this call and when told the person was unavailable stated it was an urgent legal matter. Told the person was still unavailable, he asked if I had caller ID--I asked again if he wanted to leave a message, he said no and hung up
I my daughter got a call from this number that stated that there was an arrest warrant out for her, she is only 16.
This person is harrasing us weekly asking for a person who I've never heard of. He claims to be an attorney and will not let up even though I,ve rationally explained that I don't have any idea who he's looking for. He tries to get me to disclose my info to him and I refuse. He's slick and arrogant. One more call and I'm calling the attorney general of Illinois.
A person from the line 309-663-6700 called unsolicited. I did a reverse search in public phone directory and got two results ( I know neither and do not wish to be further contacted, as I stated before it was not solicited and definitely an unwanted phone call): Marc Lanehome816 S Eldorado RdBloomington, IL 61704-6000; Wilber & Associateswork816 S Eldorado Rd, Ste 1Bloomington, IL 61704-6035::FURTHERMORE: I do not even reside in Illinois. Leave me alone you @s*holes.
You want to know who this is.... This is Wilbur and Associates. They are a attorney collection group. Deals with insurance companies in Subrogation. They managed to suspend my drivers license until I coughed up $4,500 dollars for a dirtbike accident I had.Wiki Definition:Subrogation is the legal technique under the common law by which one party, commonly an insurer (I-X) of another party (X), steps into X's shoes, so as to have the benefit of X's rights and remedies against a third party such as a defendant (D). Subrogation is similar in effect to assignment, but unlike assignment, subrogation can occur without any agreement between I-X and X to transfer X's rights. Subrogation most commonly arises in relation to policies of insurance, but the legal technique is of more general application. Using the designations above, I-X (the party seeking to enforce the rights of another) is called the subrogee. X (the party whose rights the subrogee is enforcing) is called the subrogor.In each case, because I-X pays money to X which otherwise D would have had to pay, the law permits I-X to enforce X's rights against D to recover some or all of what I-X has paid out. A very simple (and common) example of subrogation would be as follows:D drives a car negligently and damages X's car as a result. X, the insured party, has Collision insurance, and claims (i.e., asks for payment) under his policy[1] against I-X, his insurer. I-X pays in full to have X's car repaired. I-X then sues D for negligence to recoup some or all of the sums paid out to X. I-X receives the full amount of any amounts recovered in the action against D up to the amount to which I-X indemnified X. X retains none of the proceeds of the action against D except to the extent that they exceed the amount that I-X paid to X. If X were paid in full by I-X and still had a claim in full against D, then X could recover "twice" for the same loss. The basis of the law of subrogation is that when I-X agrees to indemnify X against a certain loss, then X "shall be fully indemnified, but never more than fully indemnified ... if ever a proposition was brought forward which is at variance with it, that is to say, which will prevent [X] from obtaining a full indemnity, or which will give to [X] more than a full indemnity, that proposition must certainly be wrong."[2]I-X will normally (but not always) have to bring the claim in the name of X. Accordingly, in situations where subrogation rights are likely to arise within the scope of a contract (i.e. in an indemnity insurance policy) it is quite common for the contract to provide that X, as subrogor, will provide all necessary cooperation to I-X in bringing the claim.Subrogation is an equitable remedy and is subject to all the usual limitations which apply to equitable remedies.Although the basic concept is relatively straightforward, subrogation is considered to be a highly technical area of the law.